EMDR and Brainspotting: Cousins, Not Twins
- landuiza

- 22 hours ago
- 3 min read

If you’ve been in therapy long enough—or Googled trauma therapy at 2 a.m.—you’ve probably seen EMDR and Brainspotting mentioned in the same breath. They often get lumped together, compared, or quietly pitted against each other like rival siblings at a family reunion.
The truth is simpler (and less dramatic):They’re related. They overlap. And they’re different in meaningful ways.
Let’s break it down.
What They Have in Common

Both EMDR (Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing) and Brainspotting are brain-based trauma therapies. That means they don’t rely solely on talking about what happened—they work with how the nervous system and brain store distressing experiences.
Shared foundations:
Both are based on the idea that trauma can get “stuck” in the nervous system
Both use bilateral or visual processing (eye movements, fixed gaze, or auditory stimulation)
Both aim to reduce emotional intensity, not erase memory
Both allow access to material that may be pre-verbal or difficult to articulate
Both can feel less cognitively demanding than traditional talk therapy
In short: You don’t have to explain everything perfectly for either of these to work.
EMDR: Structured, Predictable, Research-Heavy

EMDR is probably the more well-known of the two—and for good reason.
What EMDR looks like:
Uses guided eye movements or alternating stimulation
Follows a clear, eight-phase protocol
Targets specific memories, beliefs, emotions, and body sensations
Has a defined beginning, middle, and end for each target
Strengths of EMDR:
Extensive research support
Highly structured (which some clients find grounding)
Especially effective for single-incident trauma
Often helpful for clients who like clarity, goals, and direction
Potential challenges:
Can feel intense or fast-paced for some
Requires identifying specific memories or beliefs
Less flexible if someone needs more spaciousness or slowing down
Think of EMDR as the therapy equivalent of: “We’re going to follow a map—and the map is solid.”
Brainspotting: Deep, Attuned, Less Linear

Brainspotting grew out of EMDR, but it takes a different approach.
What Brainspotting looks like:
Identifies a specific eye position (a “brainspot”)
The client maintains a steady gaze rather than following movement
Emphasizes mindfulness, attunement, and nervous system regulation
Allows material to emerge without directing it
Strengths of Brainspotting:
Often gentler and less directive
Can access very early or preverbal trauma
Useful when words are limited or emotions feel diffuse
Allows the client’s system to lead the process
Expands beyond trauma processing to support work around social anxiety, performance anxiety, self-esteem, shame, guilt, and chronic self-criticism
Helpful for clients who feel emotionally “activated” in relationships but struggle to explain why
Potential challenges:
Less structured
Can feel vague or unfamiliar at first
Progress may be subtle rather than dramatic
Brainspotting often feels more like: “Let’s stay here and see what your nervous system wants to show us.”
Similar Goal, Different Path

Both approaches aim to help the brain reprocess distress so it no longer hijacks the present.
The difference isn’t depth—it’s style.
EMDR is active, organized, and time-bound
Brainspotting is relational, spacious, and organic
Neither is better. They’re simply different ways of listening to the brain.
Who Might Benefit from EMDR?
EMDR may be a good fit if you:
Prefer structure and clear steps
Want a research-backed, widely recognized approach
Are working with specific traumatic events
Like knowing what’s coming next in therapy
Feel ready to process memories more directly
Who Might Benefit from Brainspotting?
Brainspotting may be helpful if you:
Feel overwhelmed by structure or pace
Have trauma that feels early, complex, or hard to name
Experience strong body-based reactions
Struggle to verbalize emotions
Want a slower, more attuned process
A Final (Very Important) Note

EMDR and Brainspotting are tools, not magic tricks. Their effectiveness depends heavily on:
The therapist’s training and attunement
Safety and pacing
The therapeutic relationship
Your readiness and consent
No technique replaces feeling seen, respected, and emotionally safe.
And if you’re wondering which one is “right” for you? That’s often a conversation—not a diagnosis.
Sometimes the brain doesn’t need to be pushed.
Sometimes it needs permission.




Comments